Skip to main content

Manu Bhaker's gun malfunction: The origin of the disagreement between Morini and Pandit, coach

 Ronak Pandit, Indian shooting coach, and Swiss gun manufacturer Morini have reignited the debate about Bhaker's claim that her gun malfunctioned while she was competing in the Olympic 10m air pistol qualification event. At the Asaka Shooting Range, the 19-year-old was forced to wait 17 minutes, which caused him to fail to qualify for the finals.

https://github.com/bshelly-web/nlp-paraphrase

https://irwaffairs.blogspot.com/2021/08/foreign-travel.html

During the women's 10m Air Pistol event, what happened?

Bhaker's gun malfunctioned during the qualification stage after firing the 16th shot. In the next 55 minutes, the teenager had another 44 shots to take. She ended up having to complete the qualification round in 38 minutes, having had to stop due to the repairs.


At the time the malfunction occurred, Bhaker was in fourth position — the top eight proceed to the finals. To put it another way, most of her competitors had completed four of the six series or 60 shots in the qualification round by the time she finished the second series of 10 shots. Rules and regulations cannot make up for lost time when something like this happens.

How could the shooter respond now?

Either option was possible; Bhaker could have repaired the pistol or she could have used her backup gun, which was made by the same manufacturer. If she chose to repair the pistol, she ended up having an argument.

https://github.com/reescribirtextos/parafrasear

The gun was brought outside the shooting range by the Indian camp, who had set up a repair station nearby. Morini technical repair facility in the Tokyo Olympic Games. “For those unfamiliar with our location, we are next to the weapons deposit office on the left."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of International Relations: An Introduction to Realism, Liberalism and Idealism

A  theory of international relations  is a set of ideas that explains how the international system works. Unlike an ideology, a theory of international relations is (at least in principle) backed up with concrete evidence. The two major theories of international relations are realism and liberalism. National Interest Most theories of international relations are based on the idea that states always act in accordance with their  national interest, or the interests of that particular state. State interests often include self-preservation, military security, economic prosperity, and influence over other states. Sometimes two or more states have the same national interest. For example, two states might both want to foster peace and economic trade. And states with diametrically opposing national interests might try to resolve their differences through negotiation or even war. Realism According to  realism,  states work only to increase their own power relative to that
Post a Comment
Read more

International Relations: Theories, Paradigms and Approaches (A-Z)

Balance of Power Theory As a theory, balance of power predicts that rapid changes in international power and status—especially attempts by one state to conquer a region—will provoke counterbalancing actions. For this reason, the balancing process helps to maintain the stability of relations between states. A balance of power system functions most effectively when alliances are fluid, when they are easily formed or broken on the basis of expediency, regardless of values, religion, history, or form of government. Occasionally a single state plays a balancer role, shifting its support to oppose whatever state or alliance is strongest. A weakness of the balance of power concept is the difficulty of measuring power. Behavioralism An approach to the study of politics or other social phenomena that focuses on the actions and interactions among units by using scientific methods of observation to include quantification of variables whenever possible. A practitioner of behavioralism is
Post a Comment
Read more